Người trí dù khoảnh khắc kề cận bậc hiền minh, cũng hiểu ngay lý pháp, như lưỡi nếm vị canh.Kinh Pháp Cú - Kệ số 65
Người biết xấu hổ thì mới làm được điều lành. Kẻ không biết xấu hổ chẳng khác chi loài cầm thú.Kinh Lời dạy cuối cùng
Ý dẫn đầu các pháp, ý làm chủ, ý tạo; nếu với ý ô nhiễm, nói lên hay hành động, khổ não bước theo sau, như xe, chân vật kéo.Kinh Pháp Cú (Kệ số 1)
Không thể lấy hận thù để diệt trừ thù hận. Kinh Pháp cú
Sống chạy theo vẻ đẹp, không hộ trì các căn, ăn uống thiếu tiết độ, biếng nhác, chẳng tinh cần; ma uy hiếp kẻ ấy, như cây yếu trước gió.Kinh Pháp cú (Kệ số 7)
Hương hoa thơm chỉ bay theo chiều gió, tiếng thơm người hiền lan tỏa khắp nơi nơi. Kinh Pháp cú (Kệ số 54)
Kẻ hung dữ hại người cũng như ngửa mặt lên trời mà phun nước bọt. Nước bọt ấy chẳng lên đến trời, lại rơi xuống chính mình.Kinh Bốn mươi hai chương
Con tôi, tài sản tôi; người ngu sinh ưu não. Tự ta ta không có, con đâu tài sản đâu?Kinh Pháp Cú (Kệ số 62)
Nên biết rằng tâm nóng giận còn hơn cả lửa dữ, phải thường phòng hộ không để cho nhập vào. Giặc cướp công đức không gì hơn tâm nóng giận.Kinh Lời dạy cuối cùng
Nhẫn nhục có nhiều sức mạnh vì chẳng mang lòng hung dữ, lại thêm được an lành, khỏe mạnh.Kinh Bốn mươi hai chương
Trang chủ- Kinh Nam truyền
- Kinh Trường Bộ (Dīgha Nikāya)
- 13. Kinh Tam Minh
Trang chủ »» Kinh Nam truyền »» Kinh Trường Bộ (Dīgha Nikāya) »» 13. Kinh Tam Minh »»
Kinh Trường Bộ (Dīgha Nikāya) »» 13. Kinh Tam Minh
Tevijja sutta
Dịch giả:
Maurice WalsheKính mong quý độc giả xem kinh cùng góp sức hoàn thiện bằng cách gửi email về admin@rongmotamhon.net để báo cho chúng tôi biết những chỗ còn có lỗi.
Font chữ:
[235] 1. THUS HAVE I HEARD. Once the Lord was touring Kosala with a large company of some five hundred monks. He came to a Kosalan Brahmin village called Manasākata, and stayed to the north of the village in a mango-grove on the bank of the River Aciravatī.
2. And at that time many very well-known and prosperous Brahmins were staying at Manasākata, including Cankī, Tārukkha, Pokkharasāti, Jāṇussoṇi, and Todeyya.
3. And Vāseṭṭha and Bhāradvāja went strolling along the road, and as they did so, an argument broke out between them on the subject of right and wrong paths.
4. The young Brahmin Vāseṭṭha said:
‘This is the only straight path, this is the direct path, the path of salvation that leads one who follows it to union with Brahmā, as is taught by the Brahmin Pokkharasāti!’249
5. And the young Brahmin Bhāradvāja said:
‘This is the only straight path... [236] as taught by the Brahmin Tārukkha!’
6. And Vāseṭṭha could not convince Bhāradvāja, nor could Bhāradvāja convince Vāseṭṭha.
7. Then Vāseṭṭha said to Bhāradvāja:
‘This ascetic Gotama is staying to the north of the village, and concerning this Blessed Lord a good report has been spread about... (as Sutta 4, verse 2).
Let us go to the ascetic Gotama and ask him, and whatever he tells us, we shall accept.’ And Bhāradvāja agreed.
8. So the two of them went to see the Lord. Having exchanged courtesies with him, they sat down to one side, and Vāseṭṭha said: ‘Reverend Gotama, as we were strolling along the road, we got to discussing right and wrong paths. I said:
“This is the only straight path... as is taught by the Brahmin Pokkharasāti”,
and Bhāradvāja said: “This is the only straight path...as is taught by the Brahmin Tārukkha.” This is our dispute, our quarrel, our difference.’ [237]
9. ‘So, Vāseṭṭha, you say that the way to union with Brahmā is that taught by the Brahmin Pokkharasāti, and Bhāradvāja says it is that taught by the Brahmin Tārukha. What is the dispute, the quarrel, the difference all about?’
10. ‘Right and wrong paths, Reverend Gotama. There are so many kinds of Brahmins who teach different paths: the Addhāriyā, the Tittiriyā, the Chandokā, the Chandāva, the Brāhmacariyā250 Brahmins — do all these ways lead to union with Brahmā?
Just as if there were near a town or village many different paths — do all these come together at that place? And likewise, do the ways of the various Brahmins... lead the one who follows them to union with Brahmā?’
11. ‘You say: “They lead”, Vāseṭṭha?’ ‘I say: “They lead”, Reverend Gotama.’
‘You say: “They lead”, Vāseṭṭha?’ ‘I say: “They lead”, Reverend Gotama.’
‘You say: “They lead”, Vāseṭṭha?’ ‘I say: “They lead”, Reverend Gotama.’ [238]
12. ‘But, Vāseṭṭha, is there then a single one of these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas who has seen Brahmā face to face?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Then has the teacher’s teacher of any one of them seen Brahmā face to face?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Then has the ancestor seven generations back of the teacher of one of them seen Brahmā face to face?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
13. ‘Well then, Vāseṭṭha, what about the early sages of those Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, the makers of the mantras, the expounders of the mantras, whose ancient verses are chanted, pronounced and collected by the Brahmins of today, and sung and spoken about — such as Atthaka, Vāmaka, Vāmadeva, Vessāmitta, Yamataggi, Angirasa, Bhāradvāja, Vāseṭṭha, Kassapa, Bhagu251 - did they ever say: “We know and see when, how and where Brahmā appears”?’252
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
14. ‘So, Vāseṭṭha, not one of these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas has seen Brahmā face to face, nor has one of their teachers, or teacher’s teachers, [239] nor even the ancestor seven generations back of one of their teachers.
Nor could any of the early sages say: “We know and see when, how and where Brahmā appears.”
So what these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas are saying is: “We teach this path to union with Brahmā that we do not know or see, this is the only straight path... leading to union with Brahmā.”
What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Such being the case, does not what these Brahmins declare turn out to be ill-founded?’
‘Yes indeed, Reverend Gotama.’
15. ‘Well, Vāseṭṭha, when these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas teach a path that they do not know or see, saying: “This is the only straight path ... ”, this cannot possibly be right.
Just as a file of blind men go on, clinging to each other, and the first one sees nothing, the middle one sees nothing, and the last one sees nothing253-
so it is with the talk of these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas: the first one [240] sees nothing, the middle one sees nothing, the last one sees nothing. The talk of these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas turns out to be laughable, mere words, empty and vain.
16. ‘What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Do these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas see the sun and moon just as other people do, and when the sun and moon rise and set do they pray, sing praises and worship with clasped hands?’
‘They do, Reverend Gotama.’
17. ‘What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? These Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, who can see the sun and moon just as other people do, ... can they point out a way to union with the sun and moon, saying: “This is the only straight path... that leads to union with the sun and moon”?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
18. ‘So, Vāseṭṭha, these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas cannot point out a way to union with the sun and moon, which they have seen.
And, too, none of them has seen Brahmā face to face,...[241] nor has even the ancestor seven generations back of one of their teachers.
Nor could any of the early sages say: “We know and see when, how and where Brahmā appears.”
Does not what these Brahmins declare turn out to be ill-founded?’
‘Yes indeed, Reverend Gotama.’
19. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it is just as if a man were to say: “I am going to seek out and love the most beautiful girl in the country.” They might say to him: “... Do you know what caste she belongs to?” “No.” “Well, do you know her [242] name, her clan, whether she is tall or short..., dark or light-complexioned..., or where she comes from?” “No.” And they might say: “Well then, you don’t know or see the one you seek for and desire?”
and he would say: “No.” Does not the talk of that man turn out to be stupid?’
‘Certainly, Reverend Gotama.’
20. ‘Then, Vāseṭṭha, it is like this: not one of these Brahmins ... has seen Brahmā face to face, nor has one of their teachers ...’
‘Yes indeed, Reverend Gotama.’
‘That is right, Vāseṭṭha. When these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas [243] teach a path that they do not know and see, this cannot possibly be right.
21. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it is just as if a man were to build a staircase for a palace at a crossroads. People might say: “This staircase for a palace — do you know whether the palace will face east or west, north or south, or whether it will be high, low or of medium height?” and he would say: “No.” And they might say: “Well then, you don’t know or see what kind of a palace you are building the staircase for?” and he would say: “No.” Does not the talk of that man turn out to be stupid?’
‘Certainly, Reverend Gotama.’
22 — 23. (as verse 20) [244]
24. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it is just as if this River Aciravatī were brimful of water so that a crow could drink out of it, and a man should come along wishing to cross over, to get to the other side, to get across, and, standing on this bank, were to call out: “Come here, other bank, come here!” What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Would the other bank of the River Aciravatī come over to this side on account of that man’s calling, begging, requesting or wheedling?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
25. ‘Well now, Vāseṭṭha, those Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas who persistently neglect what a Brahmin should do, and persistently do what a Brahmin should not do, declare: “We call on Indra, Soma, Varuna, Isana, Pajapati, Brahmā, Mahiddhi, Yama.”
But that such Brahmins who persistently [245] neglect what a Brahmin should do, ... will, as a consequence of their calling, begging, requesting or wheedling, attain after death, at the breaking-up of the body, to union with Brahmā — that is just not possible.
26. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it is just as if this River Aciravatī were brimful of water so that a crow could drink out of it, and a man should come wishing to cross over,... but he was bound and pinioned on this side by a strong chain, with his hands behind his back. What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Would that man be able to get to the other side?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
27. ‘In just the same way, Vāseṭṭha, in the Ariyan discipline these five strands of sense-desire are called bonds and fetters. Which five? Forms seen by the eye which are agreeable, loved, charming, attractive, pleasurable, arousing desire; sounds heard by the ear... ; smells smelt by the nose ... ; tastes savoured by the tongue...; contacts felt by the body which are agreeable,... arousing desire.
These five in the Ariyan discipline are called bonds and fetters. And, Vāseṭṭha, those Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas are enslaved, infatuated by these five strands of sense-desire, which they enjoy guiltily, unaware of danger, knowing no way out.
28. ‘But that such Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, who persistently neglect what a Brahmin should do,...[246] who are enslaved by these five strands of sense-desire, ... knowing no way out, should attain after death, at the breaking-up of the body, to union with Brahmā — that is just not possible.
29. ‘It is just as if this River Aciravatī were brimful of water so that a crow could drink out of it, and a man should come along wishing to cross over... and were to lie down on this bank, covering his head with a shawl. What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Would that man be able to get to the other side?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
30. ‘In the same way, Vāseṭṭha, in the Ariyan discipline these five hindrances are called obstacles, hindrances, coverings-up, envelopings. Which five? The hindrance of sensuality, of ill-will, of sloth-and-torpor, of worry-and-flurry, of doubt. These five are called obstacles, hindrances, coverings-up, envelopings.
And these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas are caught up, hemmed in, obstructed, entangled in these five hindrances. But that such Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, who persistently neglect what a Brahmin should do... and who are caught up,... entangled in these five hindrances, should attain after death, at the breaking-up of the body, [247] to union with Brahmā - that is just not possible.
31. ‘What do you think, Vāsettha? What have you heard said by Brahmins who are venerable, aged, the teachers of teachers?
Is Brahmā encumbered with wives and wealth,254 or unencumbered?’ ‘Unencumbered, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Is he full of hate or without hate?’ ‘Without hate, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Is he full of ill-will or without ill-will?’ ‘Without ill-will, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Is he impure or pure?’ ‘Pure, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Is he disciplined255 or undisciplined?’ ‘Disciplined, Reverend Gotama.’
32. ‘And what do you think, Vāsettha?
Are the Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas encumbered with wives and wealth, or unencumbered?’ ‘Encumbered, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Are they full of hate or without hate?’ ‘Full of hate, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Are they full of ill-will or without ill-will?’ ‘Full of ill-will, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Are they impure or pure?’ ‘Impure, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Are they disciplined or undisciplined?’ ‘Undisciplined, Reverend Gotama.’
33. ‘So, Vāsettha, the Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas are encumbered with wives and wealth, and Brahmā is unencumbered. Is there any communion, anything in common between these encumbered Brahmins and the unencumbered Brahmā?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
34. ‘That is right, Vāsettha. That these encumbered Brahmins, learned in the Three Vedas, should after death, at the breaking-up of the body, [248] be united with the unencumbered Brahmā — that is just not possible.
35. ‘Likewise, do these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas and full of hate..., full of ill-will..., impure..., undisciplined, have any communion, anything in common with the disciplined Brahmā?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
36. ‘That is right, Vāseṭṭha. That these undisciplined Brahmins should after death be united with Brahmā is just not possible.
But these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, having sat down on the bank, sink down despairingly, thinking maybe to find a dry way across. Therefore their threefold knowledge is called the threefold desert, the threefold wilderness, the threefold destruction.’
37. At these words Vāseṭṭha said: ‘Reverend Gotama, I have heard them say:
“The ascetic Gotama knows the way to union with Brahmā.”’
‘What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Suppose there were a man here born and brought up in Manasākata, and somebody who had come from Manasākata and [249] and had missed the road should ask him the way. Would that man, born and bred in Manasākata, be in a state of confusion or perplexity?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama. And why not? Because such a man would know all the paths.’
38. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it might be said that such a man on being asked the way might be confused or perplexed — but the Tathagata, on being asked about the Brahmā world and the way to get there, would certainly not be confused or perplexed. For, Vāseṭṭha, I know Brahmā and the world of Brahmā, and the way to the world of Brahmā, and the path of practice whereby the world of Brahmā may be gained.’
39. At this Vāseṭṭha said:
‘Reverend Gotama, I have heard them say: “The ascetic Gotama teaches the way to union with Brahmā.” It would be good if the Reverend Gotama were to teach us the way to union with Brahmā, may the Reverend Gotama help the people of Brahmā!’
‘Then, Vāsettha, listen, pay proper attention, and I will tell you.’ ‘Very good, Reverend Sir’, said Vāseṭṭha. The Lord said:
40 — 75. ‘Vāseṭṭha, a Tathagata arises in the world, an Arabant, fully-enlightened Buddha, endowed with wisdom and conduct, Well-Farer, Knower of the worlds, incomparable Trainer of men to be tamed, Teacher of gods and humans, enlightened and blessed. He, having realised it by his own super-knowledge, proclaims this world with its devas, māras and Brahmās, its princes and people.
He preaches the Dhamma which is lovely in its beginning, lovely in its middle, lovely in its ending, in the spirit and in the letter, and displays the fully-perfected and purified holy life. [250]
A disciple goes forth, practises the moralities, attains the first jhāna (as Sutta 2, verses 43-75).
76. ‘Then, with his heart filled with loving-kindness, he dwells suffusing one quarter, [251] the second, the third, the fourth. Thus he dwells suffusing the whole world, upwards, downwards, across, everywhere, always with a heart filled with loving-kindness, abundant, unbounded,256 without hate or ill-will.
77. ‘Just as if a mighty trumpeter were with little difficulty to make a proclamation to the four quarters, so by this meditation, Vāseṭṭha, by this liberation of the heart through loving-kindness he leaves nothing untouched, nothing unaffected in the sensuous sphere.257 This, Vāseṭṭha, is the way to union with Brahmā.
78. ‘Then with his heart filled with compassion,... with sympathetic joy, with equanimity he dwells suffusing one quarter, the second, the third, the fourth. Thus he dwells suffusing the whole world, upwards, downwards, across, everywhere, always with a heart filled with equanimity, abundant, unbounded, without hate or ill-will.
79. ‘Just as if a mighty trumpeter were with little difficulty to make a proclamation to the four quarters, so by this meditation, Vāsettha, by this liberation of the heart through compassion,... through sympathetic joy,... through equanimity, he leaves nothing untouched, nothing unaffected in the sensuous sphere. This, Vāsettha, is the way to union with Brahmā.
80. ‘What do you think, Vāseṭṭha?
Is a monk dwelling thus encumbered with wives and wealth or unencumbered?’ ‘Unencumbered, Reverend Gotama.
He is without hate...,
without ill-will...,
pure and disciplined, Reverend Gotama.’ [252]
81. ‘Then, Vāseṭṭha, the monk is unencumbered, and Brahmā is unencumbered. Has that unencumbered monk anything in common with the unencumbered Brahmā?’
‘Yes indeed, Reverend Gotama.’
‘That is right, Vāsettha. Then that an unencumbered monk, after death, at the breaking-up of the body, should attain to union with the unencumbered Brahmā — that is possible.
Likewise a monk without hate..., without ill-will..., pure..., disciplined... Then that a disciplined monk, after death, at the breaking-up of the body, should attain to union with Brahmā
— that is possible.’
82. At this the young Brahmins Vāsettha and Bhāradvāja said to the Lord:
‘Excellent, Reverend Gotama, excellent! It is as if someone were to set up what had been knocked down, or to point out the way to one who had got lost, or to bring an oil-lamp into a dark place, so that those with eyes could see what was there. Just so the Reverend Gotama has expounded the Dhamma in various ways.’
‘We take refuge in the Reverend Gotama, in the Dhamma, and in the Sangha. May the Reverend Gotama accept us as lay-followers having taken refuge from this day forth as long as life shall last!’258
2. And at that time many very well-known and prosperous Brahmins were staying at Manasākata, including Cankī, Tārukkha, Pokkharasāti, Jāṇussoṇi, and Todeyya.
3. And Vāseṭṭha and Bhāradvāja went strolling along the road, and as they did so, an argument broke out between them on the subject of right and wrong paths.
4. The young Brahmin Vāseṭṭha said:
‘This is the only straight path, this is the direct path, the path of salvation that leads one who follows it to union with Brahmā, as is taught by the Brahmin Pokkharasāti!’249
5. And the young Brahmin Bhāradvāja said:
‘This is the only straight path... [236] as taught by the Brahmin Tārukkha!’
6. And Vāseṭṭha could not convince Bhāradvāja, nor could Bhāradvāja convince Vāseṭṭha.
7. Then Vāseṭṭha said to Bhāradvāja:
‘This ascetic Gotama is staying to the north of the village, and concerning this Blessed Lord a good report has been spread about... (as Sutta 4, verse 2).
Let us go to the ascetic Gotama and ask him, and whatever he tells us, we shall accept.’ And Bhāradvāja agreed.
8. So the two of them went to see the Lord. Having exchanged courtesies with him, they sat down to one side, and Vāseṭṭha said: ‘Reverend Gotama, as we were strolling along the road, we got to discussing right and wrong paths. I said:
“This is the only straight path... as is taught by the Brahmin Pokkharasāti”,
and Bhāradvāja said: “This is the only straight path...as is taught by the Brahmin Tārukkha.” This is our dispute, our quarrel, our difference.’ [237]
9. ‘So, Vāseṭṭha, you say that the way to union with Brahmā is that taught by the Brahmin Pokkharasāti, and Bhāradvāja says it is that taught by the Brahmin Tārukha. What is the dispute, the quarrel, the difference all about?’
10. ‘Right and wrong paths, Reverend Gotama. There are so many kinds of Brahmins who teach different paths: the Addhāriyā, the Tittiriyā, the Chandokā, the Chandāva, the Brāhmacariyā250 Brahmins — do all these ways lead to union with Brahmā?
Just as if there were near a town or village many different paths — do all these come together at that place? And likewise, do the ways of the various Brahmins... lead the one who follows them to union with Brahmā?’
11. ‘You say: “They lead”, Vāseṭṭha?’ ‘I say: “They lead”, Reverend Gotama.’
‘You say: “They lead”, Vāseṭṭha?’ ‘I say: “They lead”, Reverend Gotama.’
‘You say: “They lead”, Vāseṭṭha?’ ‘I say: “They lead”, Reverend Gotama.’ [238]
12. ‘But, Vāseṭṭha, is there then a single one of these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas who has seen Brahmā face to face?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Then has the teacher’s teacher of any one of them seen Brahmā face to face?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Then has the ancestor seven generations back of the teacher of one of them seen Brahmā face to face?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
13. ‘Well then, Vāseṭṭha, what about the early sages of those Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, the makers of the mantras, the expounders of the mantras, whose ancient verses are chanted, pronounced and collected by the Brahmins of today, and sung and spoken about — such as Atthaka, Vāmaka, Vāmadeva, Vessāmitta, Yamataggi, Angirasa, Bhāradvāja, Vāseṭṭha, Kassapa, Bhagu251 - did they ever say: “We know and see when, how and where Brahmā appears”?’252
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
14. ‘So, Vāseṭṭha, not one of these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas has seen Brahmā face to face, nor has one of their teachers, or teacher’s teachers, [239] nor even the ancestor seven generations back of one of their teachers.
Nor could any of the early sages say: “We know and see when, how and where Brahmā appears.”
So what these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas are saying is: “We teach this path to union with Brahmā that we do not know or see, this is the only straight path... leading to union with Brahmā.”
What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Such being the case, does not what these Brahmins declare turn out to be ill-founded?’
‘Yes indeed, Reverend Gotama.’
15. ‘Well, Vāseṭṭha, when these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas teach a path that they do not know or see, saying: “This is the only straight path ... ”, this cannot possibly be right.
Just as a file of blind men go on, clinging to each other, and the first one sees nothing, the middle one sees nothing, and the last one sees nothing253-
so it is with the talk of these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas: the first one [240] sees nothing, the middle one sees nothing, the last one sees nothing. The talk of these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas turns out to be laughable, mere words, empty and vain.
16. ‘What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Do these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas see the sun and moon just as other people do, and when the sun and moon rise and set do they pray, sing praises and worship with clasped hands?’
‘They do, Reverend Gotama.’
17. ‘What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? These Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, who can see the sun and moon just as other people do, ... can they point out a way to union with the sun and moon, saying: “This is the only straight path... that leads to union with the sun and moon”?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
18. ‘So, Vāseṭṭha, these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas cannot point out a way to union with the sun and moon, which they have seen.
And, too, none of them has seen Brahmā face to face,...[241] nor has even the ancestor seven generations back of one of their teachers.
Nor could any of the early sages say: “We know and see when, how and where Brahmā appears.”
Does not what these Brahmins declare turn out to be ill-founded?’
‘Yes indeed, Reverend Gotama.’
19. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it is just as if a man were to say: “I am going to seek out and love the most beautiful girl in the country.” They might say to him: “... Do you know what caste she belongs to?” “No.” “Well, do you know her [242] name, her clan, whether she is tall or short..., dark or light-complexioned..., or where she comes from?” “No.” And they might say: “Well then, you don’t know or see the one you seek for and desire?”
and he would say: “No.” Does not the talk of that man turn out to be stupid?’
‘Certainly, Reverend Gotama.’
20. ‘Then, Vāseṭṭha, it is like this: not one of these Brahmins ... has seen Brahmā face to face, nor has one of their teachers ...’
‘Yes indeed, Reverend Gotama.’
‘That is right, Vāseṭṭha. When these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas [243] teach a path that they do not know and see, this cannot possibly be right.
21. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it is just as if a man were to build a staircase for a palace at a crossroads. People might say: “This staircase for a palace — do you know whether the palace will face east or west, north or south, or whether it will be high, low or of medium height?” and he would say: “No.” And they might say: “Well then, you don’t know or see what kind of a palace you are building the staircase for?” and he would say: “No.” Does not the talk of that man turn out to be stupid?’
‘Certainly, Reverend Gotama.’
22 — 23. (as verse 20) [244]
24. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it is just as if this River Aciravatī were brimful of water so that a crow could drink out of it, and a man should come along wishing to cross over, to get to the other side, to get across, and, standing on this bank, were to call out: “Come here, other bank, come here!” What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Would the other bank of the River Aciravatī come over to this side on account of that man’s calling, begging, requesting or wheedling?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
25. ‘Well now, Vāseṭṭha, those Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas who persistently neglect what a Brahmin should do, and persistently do what a Brahmin should not do, declare: “We call on Indra, Soma, Varuna, Isana, Pajapati, Brahmā, Mahiddhi, Yama.”
But that such Brahmins who persistently [245] neglect what a Brahmin should do, ... will, as a consequence of their calling, begging, requesting or wheedling, attain after death, at the breaking-up of the body, to union with Brahmā — that is just not possible.
26. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it is just as if this River Aciravatī were brimful of water so that a crow could drink out of it, and a man should come wishing to cross over,... but he was bound and pinioned on this side by a strong chain, with his hands behind his back. What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Would that man be able to get to the other side?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
27. ‘In just the same way, Vāseṭṭha, in the Ariyan discipline these five strands of sense-desire are called bonds and fetters. Which five? Forms seen by the eye which are agreeable, loved, charming, attractive, pleasurable, arousing desire; sounds heard by the ear... ; smells smelt by the nose ... ; tastes savoured by the tongue...; contacts felt by the body which are agreeable,... arousing desire.
These five in the Ariyan discipline are called bonds and fetters. And, Vāseṭṭha, those Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas are enslaved, infatuated by these five strands of sense-desire, which they enjoy guiltily, unaware of danger, knowing no way out.
28. ‘But that such Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, who persistently neglect what a Brahmin should do,...[246] who are enslaved by these five strands of sense-desire, ... knowing no way out, should attain after death, at the breaking-up of the body, to union with Brahmā — that is just not possible.
29. ‘It is just as if this River Aciravatī were brimful of water so that a crow could drink out of it, and a man should come along wishing to cross over... and were to lie down on this bank, covering his head with a shawl. What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Would that man be able to get to the other side?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
30. ‘In the same way, Vāseṭṭha, in the Ariyan discipline these five hindrances are called obstacles, hindrances, coverings-up, envelopings. Which five? The hindrance of sensuality, of ill-will, of sloth-and-torpor, of worry-and-flurry, of doubt. These five are called obstacles, hindrances, coverings-up, envelopings.
And these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas are caught up, hemmed in, obstructed, entangled in these five hindrances. But that such Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, who persistently neglect what a Brahmin should do... and who are caught up,... entangled in these five hindrances, should attain after death, at the breaking-up of the body, [247] to union with Brahmā - that is just not possible.
31. ‘What do you think, Vāsettha? What have you heard said by Brahmins who are venerable, aged, the teachers of teachers?
Is Brahmā encumbered with wives and wealth,254 or unencumbered?’ ‘Unencumbered, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Is he full of hate or without hate?’ ‘Without hate, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Is he full of ill-will or without ill-will?’ ‘Without ill-will, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Is he impure or pure?’ ‘Pure, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Is he disciplined255 or undisciplined?’ ‘Disciplined, Reverend Gotama.’
32. ‘And what do you think, Vāsettha?
Are the Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas encumbered with wives and wealth, or unencumbered?’ ‘Encumbered, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Are they full of hate or without hate?’ ‘Full of hate, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Are they full of ill-will or without ill-will?’ ‘Full of ill-will, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Are they impure or pure?’ ‘Impure, Reverend Gotama.’
‘Are they disciplined or undisciplined?’ ‘Undisciplined, Reverend Gotama.’
33. ‘So, Vāsettha, the Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas are encumbered with wives and wealth, and Brahmā is unencumbered. Is there any communion, anything in common between these encumbered Brahmins and the unencumbered Brahmā?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
34. ‘That is right, Vāsettha. That these encumbered Brahmins, learned in the Three Vedas, should after death, at the breaking-up of the body, [248] be united with the unencumbered Brahmā — that is just not possible.
35. ‘Likewise, do these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas and full of hate..., full of ill-will..., impure..., undisciplined, have any communion, anything in common with the disciplined Brahmā?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama.’
36. ‘That is right, Vāseṭṭha. That these undisciplined Brahmins should after death be united with Brahmā is just not possible.
But these Brahmins learned in the Three Vedas, having sat down on the bank, sink down despairingly, thinking maybe to find a dry way across. Therefore their threefold knowledge is called the threefold desert, the threefold wilderness, the threefold destruction.’
37. At these words Vāseṭṭha said: ‘Reverend Gotama, I have heard them say:
“The ascetic Gotama knows the way to union with Brahmā.”’
‘What do you think, Vāseṭṭha? Suppose there were a man here born and brought up in Manasākata, and somebody who had come from Manasākata and [249] and had missed the road should ask him the way. Would that man, born and bred in Manasākata, be in a state of confusion or perplexity?’
‘No, Reverend Gotama. And why not? Because such a man would know all the paths.’
38. ‘Vāseṭṭha, it might be said that such a man on being asked the way might be confused or perplexed — but the Tathagata, on being asked about the Brahmā world and the way to get there, would certainly not be confused or perplexed. For, Vāseṭṭha, I know Brahmā and the world of Brahmā, and the way to the world of Brahmā, and the path of practice whereby the world of Brahmā may be gained.’
39. At this Vāseṭṭha said:
‘Reverend Gotama, I have heard them say: “The ascetic Gotama teaches the way to union with Brahmā.” It would be good if the Reverend Gotama were to teach us the way to union with Brahmā, may the Reverend Gotama help the people of Brahmā!’
‘Then, Vāsettha, listen, pay proper attention, and I will tell you.’ ‘Very good, Reverend Sir’, said Vāseṭṭha. The Lord said:
40 — 75. ‘Vāseṭṭha, a Tathagata arises in the world, an Arabant, fully-enlightened Buddha, endowed with wisdom and conduct, Well-Farer, Knower of the worlds, incomparable Trainer of men to be tamed, Teacher of gods and humans, enlightened and blessed. He, having realised it by his own super-knowledge, proclaims this world with its devas, māras and Brahmās, its princes and people.
He preaches the Dhamma which is lovely in its beginning, lovely in its middle, lovely in its ending, in the spirit and in the letter, and displays the fully-perfected and purified holy life. [250]
A disciple goes forth, practises the moralities, attains the first jhāna (as Sutta 2, verses 43-75).
76. ‘Then, with his heart filled with loving-kindness, he dwells suffusing one quarter, [251] the second, the third, the fourth. Thus he dwells suffusing the whole world, upwards, downwards, across, everywhere, always with a heart filled with loving-kindness, abundant, unbounded,256 without hate or ill-will.
77. ‘Just as if a mighty trumpeter were with little difficulty to make a proclamation to the four quarters, so by this meditation, Vāseṭṭha, by this liberation of the heart through loving-kindness he leaves nothing untouched, nothing unaffected in the sensuous sphere.257 This, Vāseṭṭha, is the way to union with Brahmā.
78. ‘Then with his heart filled with compassion,... with sympathetic joy, with equanimity he dwells suffusing one quarter, the second, the third, the fourth. Thus he dwells suffusing the whole world, upwards, downwards, across, everywhere, always with a heart filled with equanimity, abundant, unbounded, without hate or ill-will.
79. ‘Just as if a mighty trumpeter were with little difficulty to make a proclamation to the four quarters, so by this meditation, Vāsettha, by this liberation of the heart through compassion,... through sympathetic joy,... through equanimity, he leaves nothing untouched, nothing unaffected in the sensuous sphere. This, Vāsettha, is the way to union with Brahmā.
80. ‘What do you think, Vāseṭṭha?
Is a monk dwelling thus encumbered with wives and wealth or unencumbered?’ ‘Unencumbered, Reverend Gotama.
He is without hate...,
without ill-will...,
pure and disciplined, Reverend Gotama.’ [252]
81. ‘Then, Vāseṭṭha, the monk is unencumbered, and Brahmā is unencumbered. Has that unencumbered monk anything in common with the unencumbered Brahmā?’
‘Yes indeed, Reverend Gotama.’
‘That is right, Vāsettha. Then that an unencumbered monk, after death, at the breaking-up of the body, should attain to union with the unencumbered Brahmā — that is possible.
Likewise a monk without hate..., without ill-will..., pure..., disciplined... Then that a disciplined monk, after death, at the breaking-up of the body, should attain to union with Brahmā
— that is possible.’
82. At this the young Brahmins Vāsettha and Bhāradvāja said to the Lord:
‘Excellent, Reverend Gotama, excellent! It is as if someone were to set up what had been knocked down, or to point out the way to one who had got lost, or to bring an oil-lamp into a dark place, so that those with eyes could see what was there. Just so the Reverend Gotama has expounded the Dhamma in various ways.’
‘We take refuge in the Reverend Gotama, in the Dhamma, and in the Sangha. May the Reverend Gotama accept us as lay-followers having taken refuge from this day forth as long as life shall last!’258
Hết phần 13. Kinh Tam Minh (Tevijja sutta)
(Lên đầu trang)
Tập 1 có tổng cộng 16 phần.
Xem phần trước |||| Xem phần tiếp theo
Tải về dạng file RTF
(Lên đầu trang)
Tập 1 có tổng cộng 16 phần.
Xem phần trước |||| Xem phần tiếp theo
Tải về dạng file RTF
_______________
MUA THỈNH KINH SÁCH PHẬT HỌC
DO NXB LIÊN PHẬT HỘI PHÁT HÀNH
Nắng mới bên thềm xuân
Sen búp dâng đời
Tự lực và tha lực trong Phật giáo
Tổng quan kinh Đại Bát Niết-bàn
Mua sách qua Amazon sẽ được gửi đến tận nhà - trên toàn nước Mỹ, Canada, Âu châu và Úc châu.
Quý vị đang truy cập từ IP 3.144.9.183 và chưa ghi danh hoặc đăng nhập trên máy tính này. Nếu là thành viên, quý vị chỉ cần đăng nhập một lần duy nhất trên thiết bị truy cập, bằng email và mật khẩu đã chọn.
Chúng tôi khuyến khích việc ghi danh thành viên ,để thuận tiện trong việc chia sẻ thông tin, chia sẻ kinh nghiệm sống giữa các thành viên, đồng thời quý vị cũng sẽ nhận được sự hỗ trợ kỹ thuật từ Ban Quản Trị trong quá trình sử dụng website này.
Việc ghi danh là hoàn toàn miễn phí và tự nguyện.
Ghi danh hoặc đăng nhập
Thành viên đang online:
Viên Hiếu Thành Huệ Lộc 1959 Bữu Phước Chúc Huy Minh Pháp Tự minh hung thich Diệu Âm Phúc Thành Phan Huy Triều Phạm Thiên Trương Quang Quý Johny Dinhvinh1964 Pascal Bui Vạn Phúc Giác Quý Trần Thị Huyền Chanhniem Forever NGUYỄN TRỌNG TÀI KỲ Dương Ngọc Cường Mr. Device Tri Huynh Thích Nguyên Mạnh Thích Quảng Ba T TH Tam Thien Tam Nguyễn Sĩ Long caokiem hoangquycong Lãn Tử Ton That Nguyen ngtieudao Lê Quốc Việt Du Miên Quang-Tu Vu phamthanh210 An Khang 63 zeus7777 Trương Ngọc Trân Diệu Tiến ... ...
Việt Nam (161 lượt xem) - Senegal (13 lượt xem) - Hoa Kỳ (12 lượt xem) - ... ...
Viên Hiếu Thành Huệ Lộc 1959 Bữu Phước Chúc Huy Minh Pháp Tự minh hung thich Diệu Âm Phúc Thành Phan Huy Triều Phạm Thiên Trương Quang Quý Johny Dinhvinh1964 Pascal Bui Vạn Phúc Giác Quý Trần Thị Huyền Chanhniem Forever NGUYỄN TRỌNG TÀI KỲ Dương Ngọc Cường Mr. Device Tri Huynh Thích Nguyên Mạnh Thích Quảng Ba T TH Tam Thien Tam Nguyễn Sĩ Long caokiem hoangquycong Lãn Tử Ton That Nguyen ngtieudao Lê Quốc Việt Du Miên Quang-Tu Vu phamthanh210 An Khang 63 zeus7777 Trương Ngọc Trân Diệu Tiến ... ... Việt Nam (161 lượt xem) - Senegal (13 lượt xem) - Hoa Kỳ (12 lượt xem) - ... ...